CTO, Julius
Builds the Julius stack — Next.js, TypeScript and Supabase — and runs the agent-driven development processes we actually use. Writes here about what worked and what didn't, from code that runs in production rather than from slides.
Answer
No, but the mix has shifted: the repetitive and survey parts shrank, and the parts requiring a decision and accountability take up more room. Demand for experienced developers went up, not down.
5 min read ·
Article
Review that hunts for syntax errors is redundant once the compiler has caught them. What has to be hunted is decisions: a new file that should have been an extension, a dependency added quietly, and an edge case that vanished.
8 min read ·
Answer
The difference is not model quality but where the tool sits: Cursor is an editor with an agent inside it, and Claude Code is a terminal agent that leaves your editor beside it. That determines which tasks each one suits.
5 min read ·
Answer
Claude Code's central advantage is that it works across a whole repository from the terminal rather than on an open file, which suits multi-file work. For pinpoint edits that is a drawback.
5 min read ·
Article
A coding agent dramatically shortens the path from intent to running code, and shortens the path to technical debt just as much. The difference is not the tool; it is what the team calls done.
8 min read ·
